We all know who made their wiki, and from how I heard it from our arguments is that they also created their wiki to make a statement.

There is no rule to make a wiki of the same series, and it's not about official domains or who made it first. I do not care if they decided to start up their own wiki from scratch. This is none of my concern. But what I am frustrated about is that there are numerous contents that still bear high similarity to us, not to mention we even act as one of their main source of information.

Their moderators or administrators aren't even behaving like they are supposed to be: moderating pages and editing and watching over everything. There are pages left untouched that has plagiarism written all over them: all uncleaned and unfixed.

I wouldn't call what this wiki did wrong, considering the first Aifures wiki was used to try and blackmail us.

How are we in the wrong when we're the ones associated with this wikia and the original Aikatsu wiki anyway? They're not. And how is it right to get away with plagarism and copying because you're angry over trivial things?

I'm personally not gonna pick any sides - I enjoy both wikis for different reasons (canon names and song names on their part, for example). I'm gonna keep contributing to both as long as your wiki allows me to. I'm just kinda neutral about this whole thing. If me being active on both wikis is bothering any mods on here, feel free to ban me. ^^

Just because you're associated with this wikia doesn't mean you have the rights to create another one after there's already been one made. The right to make the wikia belongs to whoever made it first. While I agree that it's best for that wiki to close up since this one is obviously more popular and accurate, it **was** wrong to make another Friends wiki.

We have a right to make one when they choose to do their own for petty reasoning though, especially when they were kind of trying to make demands for us to follow in order to join them at first. I mean yes, everyone can have their opinions, but I don't think you have a right to make a wikia just because you don't like how people name characters when they're still the same whether you spell their name the way the makers do it or the way you think would be more comfortable for members.

It is not about rights or not. There are so many communities out there with more than one wiki per series. Wikia does not prevent you from creating one because a pre-existing one of the same subject exists. Wikia does not ban you from creating wikis of the same subject, and I certainly do not appreciate you pointing fingers and saying "the right to make the wikia belongs to whoever made it first". There are many wikis that are made second that have better publicity and attention over the first one, or if they are made equally great, they both get good amounts of attention. You want me to give you an example? Sure. Five Night's at Freddy's. They have definitely more than one wikia on the same subject.

It is not wrong to create another wiki. Stop trying to put the blame on us. They created their wiki to make a statement to us that they don't like us. If they don't like us, then I don't see why they have to deal with us by having us work on the same wiki as them.

Same goes for you.

If you don't like this wiki, then stay at your "official domain", "original", "first", "100% correct rights", "correct", "justice" wiki.

That's what I'm doing too!

Well, we admit we're not exactly happy about that, but we want the members to be happy above all else. So you do what you feel is best.